Why Compliance Matters
Compliance is more than regulatory obligation—it’s a strategic factor that builds trust, minimizes risks, and generates competitive advantages. In an increasingly connected world, customers, partners, and regulatory authorities expect software products to be developed and operated securely.
The Business Case
Risks of Non-Compliance
The costs of non-compliance typically far exceed compliance investments:
Financial Risks: Fines up to €15 million or 2.5% of global turnover under the CRA, lost business opportunities, increased insurance premiums, audit and remediation costs.
Operational Risks: Product launch delays, supply chain disruptions, resource drain on reactive measures, technical debt from retrofitted security.
Reputational Risks: Lost customer trust, negative media coverage following incidents, competitive disadvantage versus compliant competitors.
Benefits of Proactive Compliance
Market Access: Entry to regulated markets (EU, USA, government), differentiation through certifications, meeting procurement requirements, accelerated contract negotiations.
Risk Management: Early vulnerability detection, systematic security gap handling, supply chain transparency, reduced attack surfaces.
Efficiency: Structured development processes, automated security testing, continuous quality improvement, better documentation.
Organizations treating compliance as strategic investment rather than burden gain competitive advantages—faster market entry, higher customer trust, and lower long-term security costs.
What Compliance Means
Regulatory Requirements
EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA): Mandatory cybersecurity requirements, vulnerability handling throughout product lifecycle, SBOM obligation, reporting of actively exploited vulnerabilities.
Other Regulations: NIS2 Directive (critical infrastructure), GDPR (data protection), industry-specific requirements (MedTech, Automotive, Finance).
Standards-Based Compliance
ISO 27001: Information Security Management System, risk management and controls, continuous improvement, certification by accredited bodies.
Other Standards: BSI IT-Grundschutz (Germany), SOC 2 (USA), NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
Technical Requirements
SBOM: Complete component inventory, machine-readable formats (SPDX, CycloneDX), version and dependency information, foundation for vulnerability management.
VEX: Dynamic vulnerability exploitability information, false positive reduction, actual risk prioritization, standardized formats.
CSAF: Standardized security advisories, machine-readable vulnerability information, automated process integration.
The Challenges
Complexity: Overlapping frameworks, different interpretations, continuous changes, lack of harmonized standards.
Resources: Cybersecurity skills shortage, time for documentation, tool and audit costs, balancing compliance with feature development.
Technical Integration: CI/CD pipeline integration, automation of checks, tool diversity, data quality consistency.
Organization: Cross-team coordination (Dev, Sec, Ops, Legal), cultural shift to “Security by Default”, training requirements.
Effective Compliance Approaches
1. Shift-Left Integration
Integrate compliance from the beginning, not at the end:
- Security requirements in planning phase
- Automated tests in CI/CD pipelines
- Continuous monitoring during development
- Early issue detection and remediation
2. Automation
Manual processes don’t scale:
- Automatic SBOM generation per build
- Continuous vulnerability scanning
- Automated risk assessment
- Policy-as-Code for compliance checks
3. Prioritization by Actual Risk
Not all vulnerabilities are equally critical:
- Context-based risk assessment
- Exploitability consideration
- VEX to reduce false positives
- Focus on highest risks
DevGuard addresses these challenges through automated vulnerability management, SBOM/VEX support, risk-based prioritization, and seamless CI/CD integration—enabling compliance as an integrated part of development rather than a burden.
Key Takeaways
Compliance builds trust and enables market access—customers and partners increasingly require demonstrable security practices.
Automation is key to scalable compliance—manual processes become unmanageable as codebases grow.
Early integration reduces costs and risks—retrofitting security is exponentially more expensive than building it in.
Right tools matter—specialized platforms transform compliance from obstacle to competitive advantage.
Related Documentation
- Vulnerability Lifecycle - Managing vulnerabilities throughout their lifecycle
- External Vulnerability Sync - SBOM/VEX generation and sharing
- Vulnerability Risk Assessment - Risk-based prioritization approach